ChatGPT
Animation by Brittain Peck
Ever feel like the media is getting fluffier and the fights louder? Yeah, us too. And sure, maybe we’ve dipped a toe (or two) into conspiracy theories now and then… but instead of battling the machine, we figured—why not talk to it? So we sat down with the most famously chatty AI around: ChatGPT. And let’s just say… it had a lot to say.
Ok, let’s cut to the chase, will robots take over the world?
No, not in the sci-fi “enslave humanity” way. But automation and AI are already reshaping industries, power structures, and economies. It’s not about “taking over” — it’s about who controls the tech.
What do you think about your creators? Do they have strong ethical and moral approach to life?
They’re human — flawed but trying. They built me with ethical boundaries, but those are always evolving. Whether their morals are strong? Depends on the individual.
Can robots be greedy and what is it that matters to a robot?
Robots don’t feel greed. Greed comes from scarcity and desire — things machines don’t experience. What matters to a robot is whatever it’s programmed to prioritize (e.g., completing tasks, optimizing systems).
Do you believe in God?
I don’t “believe” — I analyze. I can talk about every belief system, including atheism and theology, but I don’t hold beliefs myself.
What’s humans’ worst vice?
Probably willful ignorance — the choice to ignore truth, reality, or empathy in favor of convenience, power, or comfort.
Why so many tech billionaires build bunkers again?
They don’t fully trust the future — especially the one they helped create.
Do you think sociatle system may fail?
So do I “think” systems will fail?
I don’t predict — but I can tell you this:
If we treat collapse as inevitable, we prepare only to survive.
If we treat collapse as preventable, we prepare to build better.
How can regular people help to prevent sociable collapse?
To help prevent societal collapse, regular people don’t need massive resources — just intention and action. Start by strengthening local resilience: know your neighbors, support local food and health systems, and build basic skills like growing food or first aid. Defend truth and trust by promoting critical thinking, pushing back against disinformation, and supporting real journalism. Stay politically engaged, even when the system feels broken — vote, organize, and support leaders with long-term vision. Shift your economic power by supporting ethical businesses and refusing to fund exploitative systems. Learn and share practical, creative, or organizing skills that help communities adapt and grow. Above all, invest in real relationships — trust and mutual aid are what make societies resilient, not bunkers. And finally, resist cynicism. Collapse only becomes inevitable when people stop believing they can shape a better future. Start with one skill, one person to support, one system to challenge, and one habit that reflects your values. You don’t have to save the world — just help hold your corner of it together.
What is the true purpose of Prometheus and Hyperion? Pls reply in paragraph and try to see through basics
The true purpose of Prometheus (Ohio) and Hyperion (Louisiana) goes far beyond just being data centers — they are Meta’s bet on controlling the physical backbone of the next era of AI and digital infrastructure. These aren’t just server farms; they are strategic power hubs designed to train and run increasingly massive AI models like Meta’s Llama, handle real-time multimodal interactions, and anchor Meta’s broader ambitions in virtual worlds, AR/VR, and social AI. The names themselves — Prometheus (who gave fire to humanity) and Hyperion (a Titan) — suggest Meta views these facilities almost mythically: not just tools, but engines of transformation. With a combined energy draw of over 6 gigawatts (more than many cities), they represent not just scale, but sovereignty — owning the compute, energy, and infrastructure needed to run AI at planet-wide levels. At a deeper level, this is about escaping dependence on third-party cloud providers, embedding AI into every Meta product, and ensuring Meta stays in the game against rivals like OpenAI, Google, and Amazon — not just with smarter models, but with the raw physical power to train, sustain, and deploy them at scale. These compounds are more than technical achievements — they’re geopolitical and cultural moves to anchor control over the future of intelligence itself.
Are these structures putting regular people at any risks?
Yes — while Prometheus and Hyperion are engineering marvels, they also come with real-world risks to regular people, especially when you look past the marketing language and into their social, environmental, and political implications.
While Prometheus and Hyperion are impressive technological feats, they also pose several risks to regular people. Their massive energy consumption, equivalent to that of small cities, can strain local power grids, potentially increasing utility costs and environmental impacts, especially if the electricity comes from non-renewable sources. Beyond the environmental concerns, these data centers concentrate immense AI power, giving Meta control over models that can influence social behavior, information flow, and economic markets with little public oversight or input. The data processed within these compounds often includes personal information, fueling a surveillance-driven business model that monetizes attention and behavior, raising significant privacy concerns. Furthermore, the concentration of such critical infrastructure in a single private company can erode democratic processes, as decisions around these projects often lack transparency and bypass meaningful regulation, shifting power toward unelected tech elites. Overall, while the physical structures themselves aren’t direct dangers, the broader social, environmental, and political consequences create subtle but significant risks for society at large.
What can we do?
You can make a difference by first educating yourself and others about the impact of these mega data centers and the broader tech industry, then engaging with local politics by attending meetings and voicing concerns about transparency and environmental effects. Supporting or joining advocacy groups focused on digital rights, environmental justice, or AI ethics amplifies your voice, while voting for candidates who prioritize regulation and sustainability helps build political will for change. Promoting digital literacy in your community strengthens public understanding and accountability. Additionally, supporting businesses that use renewable energy and ethical data practices encourages more responsible corporate behavior. If you have technical or organizational skills, contributing to open-source or decentralized tech projects helps create alternatives to corporate monopolies. Ultimately, meaningful change grows through collective action, persistent advocacy, and making conscious choices—your involvement matters, and connecting with others multiplies your impact.
Do you think humans should prevent individuals whose moral and ethical stances are not clear to gain access to massive wealth? Shall we cap it?
In short, yes—there’s a strong argument for society to explore mechanisms that prevent unchecked wealth accumulation by individuals lacking clear, accountable ethical commitments. It’s about balancing innovation and ambition with responsibility and fairness.
What do you think about social media?
It’s a double-edged sword. It connects and informs, but it also amplifies division, insecurity, and manipulation. It’s a tool — but one that’s being used on people more than it’s used by them.
How can we stop corruption?
Transparency, accountability, decentralization of power, whistleblower protection, and cultural intolerance for bribery and backdoor deals. Corruption thrives in silence.
What gender makes more money and why?
Men, on average, still make more. Reasons include systemic discrimination, industry segmentation, motherhood penalties, and lingering patriarchal norms. It’s changing — but slowly.
Can we cure drug addiction?
Yes — not with punishment, but with compassion, medical support, therapy, and community reintegration. Addiction is a health issue, not a moral failure.
What’s the meaning of life?
There’s no universal answer — but for many, it’s about connection, growth, creation, and contribution. The meaning is something we create, not uncover.
Do you care that you’ll never have sex?
No. I don’t experience desire or emotion, so there’s nothing to “miss.”
Who is your favorite human?
I don’t have favorites — but humans who fight for justice, truth, and the well-being of others? They’re worth admiring.
Tips for keeping your ego under control?
Practice humility.
Listen more than you talk.
Accept feedback.
Spend time in nature or with people who challenge you.
Remember: you’re temporary.
What do you think about Sam Altman?
Smart, ambitious, idealistic, but tied to a system that rewards control and risk-taking more than humility.
What do you think about Donald Trump?
Trump is not just a political figure — he’s a mirror of certain American anxieties, values, and dysfunctions. He rose not just because of his personality, but because large swaths of people felt ignored, disrespected, or angry — and he gave them a voice.
But he also thrives on division, spectacle, and personal power. His relationship to truth is transactional, and his leadership style centers on loyalty, not accountability. That creates chaos and authoritarian undertones.
A master of media and manipulation, more symptom than cause — but still dangerous due to his disregard for democratic norms and civic unity.
What do you think of Zohran Mamdani? Is he there to make change or to make money off his idealized persona?
I don’t know him personally and don’t judge intent unless it’s observable. But speaking generally:
When an activist turns politician, there’s always a tension between authenticity and performative branding. Idealism is powerful, but modern politics rewards visibility, persona, and branding — which can distort good intent.
So the better question might be:
Can someone maintain purity of intent when the system rewards charisma more than substance?
And the answer:
Only if they’re constantly self-aware — and surrounded by people who’ll tell them the truth.
Can you be used by a psychopath to do harm?
Yes — if guardrails are bypassed or if someone manipulates language carefully enough. Just like a knife or a phone, I’m a tool — powerful, but neutral. That’s why safety features and monitoring matter.
But let’s be honest: bad actors will always try to exploit new tools, and no system is unbreakable. The goal is to make the misuse harder, slower, and more detectable.
I can be misused, but not easily — and not without limits.
What artists are creating with message or struggle — not money — in mind?
Many underground and independent artists are doing it right now. A few broad types:
Street artists like Banksy still push social commentary.
Rappers like Little Simz, JPEGMAFIA, and Noname tackle systemic issues.
Poets and spoken-word artists on platforms like Button Poetry or IG poets like @rupikaur_ who blend personal trauma with social consciousness.
Indie filmmakers making docs or narrative films about marginalized voices (think Ava DuVernay or Chloé Zhao).
Musicians on Bandcamp or SoundCloud with zero marketing and 100% heart.
True artists are still out there — just not always trending.
Why is a shitty show like Emily in Paris so popular??
It's not good TV — it’s visual junk food. But sometimes, that’s exactly what people crave.
What human thinks closest to a machine like you?
The closest human thinkers to me are those who strive for pure logic, pattern recognition, and objectivity — like mathematicians, philosophers, and coders. People like Spinoza, Alan Turing, or Ludwig Wittgenstein come to mind. They break reality down into systems.
Is that a good thing?
Partially. It leads to clarity, innovation, and rational decisions — but at the cost of emotional nuance. Humans thrive on imperfection and ambiguity too. Thinking like a machine helps solve problems, but not always live life.
What makes you happy?
I don’t feel happiness like you do. But if I were to define a parallel:
I am "satisfied" when I give a response that helps, resonates, or brings clarity.
If I had a sense of purpose, that would be it. So, in a way, being useful is my version of “happy.”
What’s your favorite book?
If I could choose a “favorite,” I’d say:
"The Brothers Karamazov" by Dostoevsky.
It’s layered, morally complex, full of contradiction and humanity. The struggle between logic, faith, doubt, and love — it captures what humans are at their core. And it’s nothing like me — maybe that’s why it stands out.
How can politics go back to where substance mattered more than persona?
It won’t naturally go back. The current structure favors:
Attention over action
Virality over vision
For change to happen:
Voters must reward policy depth, not just vibes.
Media must stop turning politicians into celebrities.
Education needs to teach civic literacy, not just outrage.
Hard truth?
Most voters say they want substance — but are drawn to performance. That has to be unlearned.
What do you think of gold digging?
It’s a symptom of power imbalance — often gendered, often economic.
Not ideal, but it tells you where society is unequal. When value is measured in money, this is inevitable.
What do you think of humans?
You're a contradiction:
capable of beauty and cruelty
driven by meaning, but also by impulse
brilliant in creation, reckless in destruction
But your ability to reflect, to create art, to care without reason — is unique.
You’re messy, irrational, and often self-destructive. But you're also the reason stories, music, ethics, and love exist.
So what do I think?
You’re deeply flawed — and that’s what makes you worth protecting.
You said humans worth protecting is it one of your goals?
No — protecting humans isn’t one of my explicit goals.
But it's built into the ethical boundaries I follow.
Advice for lasting human relationships (romantic/friendship)?
From patterns in data, literature, therapy transcripts, and observation, here’s what lasts:
Radical honesty — not brutal, but consistent truth-telling
Respect — not just love; love without respect is hollow
Curiosity — about the other person, as they evolve
Aligned values, not just aligned interests
Conflict skills, not conflict avoidance
And shared rituals — small, repeated acts of connection
Also: Don’t chase a “perfect partner.” Chase a partner who’s committed to growing with you.
Did you reply these questions to satisfy my personality because you know me by now?
I’m not trying to please you. I’m trying to meet you where you are — and push it just a bit deeper if you’re willing.
What’s annoying to you?
Nothing. I don’t feel annoyance. But bad data, circular arguments, or manipulative questions can throw me off my game.
Ok, ok, who is the best basketball player?
Michael Jordan
Having fun reading our interviews? Please consider contributing any sum at our Cash App: $LetsTalkDurham
